Sars Loses Appeal in Software Capex Tussle
- Nov
- 09
- 2010
- Posted by MDACC
- Posted in Taxation Blog
The issue of whether expenditure is of a capital or revenue nature was recently considered again by our courts. The North Gauteng High Court heard an appeal on this issue, in the matter of Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (SARS) v I-Net Bridge (Pty) Ltd. The appeal was brought by SARS, which had lost in the Tax Court.
There have been numerous cases considering this issue. The governing legal principles are regarded as settled and familiar, but each case is dependent upon its own facts, so hence the ongoing series of cases. The issue is important, because it can determine whether the expenditure in question is deductible for income purposes, or not.
The expenditure incurred by I-Net Bridge was a licence fee in the amount of R41 million. It was paid to a United Kingdom company, for the use of electronic content, data and information. It covered a period of five years. The payment was made in advance for the whole period, by way of a share issue and creation of a loan account.
The nature of exactly what I-Net Bridge acquired in return for its expenditure was considered in some detail. It was found that an integrated system was acquired. This included the data itself (which constituted I-Net Bridge’s trading stock), as well as a software system and licence to receive and decode the data. SARS contended that this constituted part of I-Net Bridge’s income earning structure and was therefore capital in nature. I-Net Bridge argued that the expenditure was all incurred in order to acquire its trading stock (being, the data).
I-Net Bridge’s counsel used a simple analogy to support the above argument. If one wants to purchase milk from a supermarket, one must also purchase the container in which the milk is sold. The entire cost is clearly for the acquisition of the milk. The data which constituted I-Net Bridge’s trading stock could not be purchased without the whole integrated system. It would otherwise be unreadable and useless. The system could not be used for any purpose other than receiving and decoding the specific data.
The court accepted I-Net Bridge’s argument and found that the expenditure was revenue in nature and therefore deductible. The fact that the expenditure was made up front and in the form of shares and a loan account, was found not to affect its nature.
TAXtalk: www.taxtalk.co.za
All material subject to our Legal Disclaimers.
Recent Posts
- MD Accountants & Auditors Inc. | Budget 2021 25/02/2021
- MD’s Current News | February 2021 23/02/2021
- MD Accountants & Auditors Inc – Section 12J Webinar 16/02/2021
- Trusts welcome DTIC Minister Patel’s support for ownership schemes 15/02/2021
- FORFEITURE OF SEVERANCE PAY 12/02/2021
- MD’s Top Tax Savings Tips – Ahead of the Budget on 24 February 2021!!! 11/02/2021
- UIF launches e-compliance certificate system 10/02/2021
- MD’s Top Tax Savings Tips ahead of the Budget on 24th February 09/02/2021
- Potential taxes to fund the vaccine. Be prepared and plan now before the Budget! 08/02/2021
- Employment Equity Amendment Bill described as a “game-changer” 03/02/2021
- Are you being sold a dubious B-BBEE share option scheme? Hear what the B-BBEE Commission has to say… 01/02/2021
- FILING SEASON 2020: DEADLINE FOR ONLINE FILERS EXTENDED 29/01/2021
- Businesses reminded of City support to offer relief 26/01/2021
- 2nd 2021 Provisional Tax Information Request 18/01/2021
- Changes to the South African Exchange Control Rules 13/01/2021
- MD are now on Instagram too!!! 07/01/2021
- Congratulations to Amanda Kungwayo – 15 years with MD today! 03/01/2021
- PAIA manual | MD ACCOUNTANTS AND AUDITORS INCORPORATED | Date of revision: 15/12/2020 23/12/2020
- Season’s Greetings 21/12/2020
- COIDA: EXCLUSION OF DOMESTIC WORKERS INVALID: Employers’ contributions cannot be backdated 09/12/2020
- Congratulations to Juanita Roman – 20 years with MD today! 01/12/2020
- BEE pioneers fight for their legitimacy 27/11/2020