SARS refuses to use 3rd party bank accounts for refunds
- Sep
- 17
- 2009
- Posted by MDACC
- Posted in Taxation Blog
Provides details on when input tax may be denied or limited.
Due to concerns involving VAT refund fraud, the use of third party bank accounts will only be permitted in the case of non-resident companies, subsidiaries, holding companies and divisional registrations on condition that Sars is indemnified against any loss which may occur. The indemnification is effected by a VAT119i and where this form is not on record at Sars, the VAT refunds will be withheld until such time the vendor has furnished Sars with such form. The resultant effect of this particular Sars practice is twofold. Firstly, vendors who have not provided Sars with this form and who make use of one bank account must be aware that their refunds could be withheld for this reason. Secondly, by furnishing Sars with a VAT119i, vendors are relinquishing any recourse they may have had in their refund going amiss should they have a disagreement with Sars as to the payment of the refund.
Beware Barter transactions!
Bartering is a mechanism by which goods or services are directly exchanged for other goods or services without the exchange of money). Barter transactions are occurring increasingly in the commercial environment particularly with the advent of the internet.
For example internet companies often exchange rights to place advertisements on each others websites and sponsorship deals result in the sponsor receiving advertising in return. The VAT implications of such transactions are frequently overlooked or misunderstood.
The values of the exchanged goods/services
Often the values of the swapped goods/services are equal and the vendor would usually be placed in a VAT neutral position where the output tax and input tax would be the same.
However, instances may arise where the value of each good or service being exchanged is different. The VAT Act states that the value of the supply is the open market value of the goods or services received in return.
Where the values of the exchanged goods or services are different, the transaction will not result in a VAT neutral position for the parties involved. Where one party supplies something that has a greater value and receives something that has a lesser value, this party would have to declare output tax on the lesser value and be entitled to claim an input tax on the greater value.
Exchanges where the input tax may be denied or limited
Circumstances may arise where either the input tax is denied due to the nature of the supply or because the acquiring vendor is applying the goods or services for exempt or partly exempt purposes. Consider a situation where advertising is exchanged for alcoholic beverages. The VAT Act denies the input tax on any goods or service acquired for the purposes of entertainment. In this case, the vendor must declare output tax on the value of the advertising but would not be entitled to an input tax deduction on the acquisition of the beverages. Similarly, where the goods or services acquired are applied for exempt or partly exempt purposes, the input tax claim would be limited accordingly.
Responsibility of the vendors
In all barter transactions involving the exchange of goods or services valid tax invoices must be issued by both supplying vendors in order to substantiate the supply and to enable the acquiring vendor to be entitled to claim the input tax.
SARS take
SARS would not necessarily take a holistic view where output and input tax are equal: the infringing vendor would be assessed on the under declaration of output tax. Understandably vendors which make use of apportionment ratios require even more attention to barter transactions due to the biased VAT result.
TAXtalk: www.taxtalk.co.za.
All material subject to our Legal Disclaimers.
Recent Posts
- Tax evaders should face jail time to curb rising non-compliance – Judge Dennis Davis 15/04/2021
- ASA Newsletter April 2021 – Article by Dave Rich 14/04/2021
- Domestic employees will now be entitled to compensation if they are injured or contract diseases while on duty 12/04/2021
- POPIA – ARE YOU READY? 08/04/2021
- Justice on 100 day countdown to be POPIA compliant 30/03/2021
- 2021/2022 MD Tax Card is now available!!! 16/03/2021
- Extended COVID-19 TERS relief for certain categories of employees 10/03/2021
- MD Accountants & Auditors Inc. | Budget 2021 25/02/2021
- MD’s Current News | February 2021 23/02/2021
- MD Accountants & Auditors Inc – Section 12J Webinar 16/02/2021
- Trusts welcome DTIC Minister Patel’s support for ownership schemes 15/02/2021
- FORFEITURE OF SEVERANCE PAY 12/02/2021
- MD’s Top Tax Savings Tips – Ahead of the Budget on 24 February 2021!!! 11/02/2021
- UIF launches e-compliance certificate system 10/02/2021
- MD’s Top Tax Savings Tips ahead of the Budget on 24th February 09/02/2021
- Potential taxes to fund the vaccine. Be prepared and plan now before the Budget! 08/02/2021
- Employment Equity Amendment Bill described as a “game-changer” 03/02/2021
- Are you being sold a dubious B-BBEE share option scheme? Hear what the B-BBEE Commission has to say… 01/02/2021
- FILING SEASON 2020: DEADLINE FOR ONLINE FILERS EXTENDED 29/01/2021
- Businesses reminded of City support to offer relief 26/01/2021
- 2nd 2021 Provisional Tax Information Request 18/01/2021
- Changes to the South African Exchange Control Rules 13/01/2021